Posted
19th December 2016
Research

There has been lots of debate over many years about the extent to which hospitals should provide single rooms for patients. Should every patient have a single room for the sake of privacy? Would this help to reduce HCAI? And would it be safe even if it did? A recent review suggests that more single rooms equals less HCAI. The systematic review found that hospital wards with more single rooms had lower rates of HCAI. This makes sense: physical segregation of patients with infectious agents is an ancient approach to preventing transmission. However, whilst the evidence that single rooms reduces HCAI is compelling, there are other reasons why a mixture of single rooms and bays may be a better approach. Some patients benefit from the social aspects of communal bed-spaces. Also, when things go wrong, there is some evidence that patients in multi-occupancy bays are helped more quickly and have better outcomes. On the balance of this evidence, it may be that a mixture of single rooms and bays is the best design for a hospital of the future. The UK recommends at least 50% single rooms for new hospitals, which would seem a sensible approach based on the current evidence!
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Tags
Latest News
GAMA Healthcare named one of The Sunday Times Best Places to Work 2026
National recognition celebrates GAMA’s exceptional culture, purpose-driven people and commitment to employee…
Protecting vulnerable skin: New evidence highlights the role of structured skin care in preventing pressure injuries
A newly published randomised controlled trial has demonstrated that structured…
Hantavirus at sea: Why the recent cruise ship outbreak matters for IPC
A recent hantavirus outbreak aboard an expedition cruise ship has…
Beyond handrubs: Why QAC wipes could be the future of hand hygiene in challenging environments
Hand hygiene remains one of the most powerful tools in…




